Three over years of my life was spent in Dili, East Timor where you don’t just go out in the night after work. There were no street lamps in the capital city, no shopping complex, no cinema. I stayed home and when I wasn’t reading, mostly I was playing chess on my Palm PDA.
In fact I played a lot of chess but poorly. Partly the Palm was to blame because whenever I realised that I had made a silly move I could just as easily retract my move and make a wiser one. I could keep doing this until I win the game. Invariably I emerged the winner because my only opponent was a machine who did not object to my re-moves and could not object.
Even so I developed a healthy respect for this ancient game of strategy and learned its underlying rationale which is very relevant to life.
In chess, the way you opened your game determines your next series of moves. Expert players know how to respond according to the “book” moves. The game becomes complicated only when a player begins to deviate from known opening theory thus seizing the initiative. The player who lacks the skills or foresight will lose the initiative, forced to be on the defensive, lose ground and finally is checkmated.
Expert players and spectators know the game, could see what is happening at each stage of the game. But if you are like me, you would be mostly lost. A move is a move is a move. We put our focus on each move as it happens. We do not possess the knowledge or skill to admire, appreciate or understand the impact a particular move would have on the entire game. So we only get excited at other spectators’ excitement, not understanding the significance of the move that has been made.
Today in the country, many of us are keenly watching games being played. Except the name of the game is politics. A very complex game of strategy. What opening moves are being made. When does a player deviates from the “book” and surprises his or her opponent in turn requiring the opponent to deviate from his or her own preferred strategy. Like expert chess players, political players see several moves ahead in their plan to outmanoeuver their opponents and they have multiple choices for their endgame.
Uninitiated spectators easily get thrown off the trail and end up thoroughly disoriented, frustrated or fed up. At such times words like “bodoh”, “stupid”, “silly”, “monkeys” and “donkeys” if not the more crude expletives leave our mouths like rapid fire. In fact, seasoned politicians of both sides of the parliamentary divide are more often than not smart rather than silly. They know their game and they react by reading well their opponents’ game plan.
Unfortunately for us and the nation, the game of politics are high stakes not just for the players themselves but more so the rakyat who suffer depending on the outcome of the game.
Here my chess contest against an inanimate Palm PDA has not been helpful. If I am not careful, in life I may be lulled into thinking that in effect I have no opponent. But in real politics, the side I back is up against real opponents who are more than capable of fighting back and can keep making my side deviate from its original game plan. Quite often in sports, we see our side losing and we shower expletives, blame and even curses on them. “Sack the coach, sack the players!”
Anything and everything except sack the spectators. We sometimes think, feel and talk as though only we the spectators are smart and right.
We think and talk as though our team is playing against no opponent. But as long as the opponents are still standing, they will come back at you and influence the way you play. The best teams often force us not to be able to play our normal game. Our opponents are for real. We take this route, they will catch up with us and close out our path. We find and present this “proof” and they will find ways to neutralise or obliviate it.
It is very tough to play when the match officials cannot be questioned, the goal posts are movable, the playing field is never level. It is very trying to watch a match played under such conditions.
Frustration is not the answer. Don’t so quickly judge and fault your own players or give up on them. At any stage of the match, either side can make mistakes. Don’t be discouraged when the other side has scored a goal. There is still time. There are still initiatives we can deploy. Simply because we haven’t won yet does not mean we have lost. The game isn’t over till it is over. Stay with the match.
July 29, 2008 at 1:13 pm
Bravo,
Yes, we have not lost and therefore shall we
persevere till we win. Just wait and be watchful!
July 29, 2008 at 1:47 pm
Ah, but don’t also forget hat the rules of the game keep changing to suit the “other side”. Has anyone else noticed how quickly cases which are reported by BN are investigated, while any Police report from PR, never sees the light of day? I have as yet to hear one single case of PR vs BN (any charge) be investigated.
Why?
July 29, 2008 at 2:49 pm
It’s a case of “KUMAN DI SEBERANG LAUT NAMPAK
TAPI GAJAH DI BIBIR MATA TA NAMPAK”
July 29, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Yes ! beautifully said, the field is never level but I always go with the underdog and support the underpriveledge.
July 29, 2008 at 3:08 pm
Don’t just wait and be watchful. Do something…anything however minute however ineffectual it may seem, if you feel you are helping the cause JUST DO IT!
July 29, 2008 at 6:10 pm
I once lost a game in a competition to an opponent whose opening 2 moves were, D2-D3 and D3-D4. Surprised me and I wondered why I lost the game.
Well, we will always be at war as long as the incumbent government remains.
July 29, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Looks like this game will have no winner after all… menang jadi arang, kalah jadi abu.
So we’ll never hear those familiar sentence “And, the winner is….” by the end of this game.
Rather, it is more likely that the “appropriate” statement for the duration of this game battle, which may have been the longest we’ll have to face ever, is the glaring statement “And the looser is…”
To which the answer will be the RAKYAT!
July 29, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Politics is like ches but the difference is its dirtyness;washing dirty linen in public;all the wild accusations;the characters like chameleon;corruption and so on,etc
July 30, 2008 at 2:34 am
An apt analogy indeed. And to some the latest revelation of a medical report is “checkmate!”. But as analogies go, it has painted the political scenario in a nutshell, so to speak. What is happening to Malaysia is NOT a chess game and it didn’t start with the incarceration of Anwar in 1998, nor will it end when he becomes PM before the year is out. Yes, the maneuvers and counter moves bespeak of a major on-going battle and whilst it is exciting to observe and comment, the means and moves uncover underhanded and dirty tactics the likes of which we would have been aghast to see in a soap opera of the ilk of Dallas or Desperate Housewives! Not to mention the buffoonery some of the players are capable of! Much more is being exposed than the government would admit, and yes, so much is at stake, that one would even stoop to commit murder….
July 30, 2008 at 2:47 am
Great post. There was a time when such games were taught as “safe” allegories to real life to instruct people on moral, as well as difficult, decisions and conduct in the real world.
July 30, 2008 at 6:36 am
When goal posts are moved so often by same officials without due regard to the spectators, and worse still by devious methods, the game is already lost because the spectators will abandon in disgust. Really the ticket to the game is in our hands and we won. Makes no sense to play to an empty and deserted field, right?
July 31, 2008 at 9:43 am
Yet the chess game starting with level playing factor with limited character and area of movement on which can be accurately determine mathematically. Real life politic do have a lot of variable and the extend of limits to infinity.
However, since homosapiens do exist and live toward the life of the dreams and afraid of nightmare – so the best formula is to drive the crowds to believed that the actual nightmare is the only way in order to achieved the sweetest dreams..